拍前风险词表免费检查器投放角度平台规格样例计划指南工具对照模板English

素材验收记分表

更新于 2026-08-15 · 风险词表版本 2026-08-15c

达人回片之后、花钱之前用的一张表。做法沿用一条用户研究的纪律:只有可观察的东西算分,"挺好看的"记 0。先过 7 条硬性检查,再打 0–10 分决定投不投。

全文在下面,也可以下载 .md。免费、可商用、可改、不用署名。

模板是英文的:收件人(达人 / 拍摄方)多半读英文,中文卖家看结构就够了。

下载 creative-scorecard.md纯文本 Markdown,可直接贴进飞书 / Notion / 企微,也可以打印。

这份模板里有什么

内容
A. Brief compliance (pass/fail — any fail sends it back)
B. Score (0–10)
C. What we do next
D. Notes back to the creator

怎么用

模板全文

下面就是完整内容(英文,因为收件人多半读英文)。可以直接全选复制,也可以用上面的下载按钮。

# Creative acceptance scorecard

> Score the video you got back **before** you spend money on it.
> Rule borrowed from user research: only observable things score. "It looks nice" is zero.

Video: [file / link] · Creator: [name] · SKU: [name] · Date: [date] · Scored by: [name]

## A. Brief compliance (pass/fail — any fail sends it back)

| # | Check | Pass? | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | The hook is said verbatim in the first 3 seconds | ☐ | |
| A2 | Nothing from the "do not say" list appears in speech | ☐ | |
| A3 | Nothing from the "do not say" list appears in captions | ☐ | |
| A4 | No scales, tape measures, body measurements, or pinching fat | ☐ | |
| A5 | Before/after (if used) changed exactly one variable | ☐ | |
| A6 | Aspect and safe area are correct | ☐ | |
| A7 | AI-generated content is disclosed, if applicable | ☐ | |

**Any unchecked box above = send back for a re-shoot or a re-edit. Do not "fix it in the caption".**

## B. Score (0–10)

| Points | Observable thing |
|---|---|
| +3 | The proof shot exists, is one take, and is legible on a phone at arm's length |
| +2 | The first 3 seconds contain a physical action, not a talking head |
| +2 | The claim made on screen is something the garment actually does |
| +1 | The size worn is stated, with the wearer's height/weight or usual size |
| +1 | Audio is usable without music (you can hear the words) |
| +1 | The video still makes sense with the sound off |
| −2 | The strongest moment is after second 15 (nobody gets there) |
| −2 | The product is only visible flat-lay / on a hanger, never worn in motion |
| −1 | The creator reads the script instead of talking |
| −1 | The caption repeats the voiceover word for word |

**Reading**: 7+ run it · 4–6 run it in the cheapest test cell only · ≤3 do not spend on it.

## C. What we do next

- [ ] Runs as A/B cell: [which cell / which hook it is testing]
- [ ] Re-cut needed: [what exactly]
- [ ] Re-shoot needed: [which shot only — never "do it all again"]
- [ ] Pay / repost / send the next sample

## D. Notes back to the creator

Say what to keep, not just what to fix. One line each:

- Keep: [what worked]
- Change: [one thing, the most important one]

---

These risk flags are an assisted check. They are not a compliance ruling and not legal advice — the platform’s review and your own legal judgment decide.

Risk-term list version 2026-08-15c. Template published by Preshoot — free to copy, edit and use commercially.

其它模板

达人 brief 模板(英文,一页纸)一页纸的英文达人 brief。填完括号就能直接发出去,含"不要说的话"和"不要拍的画面"两节——寄样之前把这两节写清楚,比拍完再返工便宜得多。ROAS 复盘表测试窗口结束后填的表。它只回答一个问题:赢的是角度还是钩子——这决定下一笔预算该换角度还是换第一句话。停投与放量的阈值要求你在投之前就填好。

常见问题

为什么要在花钱之前打分?

因为投出去之后再判断,你分不清是素材差还是投放差。先用一张表把明显不能投的挡掉,剩下的差异才有归因价值。

7 分以上就一定能跑赢吗?

不能。这张表挡的是"明显浪费钱的素材",不预测赢面。赢面要靠 A/B 矩阵和复盘表测出来。

达人会不会觉得被挑刺?

把 D 段("保留什么 / 改哪一件事")真的填了就不会。只说改什么的反馈会让人防御,先说保留什么的反馈会让人改。

为什么"字幕和口播逐字相同"要扣分?

因为屏幕上的字和耳朵里的话重复,等于浪费了一条信息通道。字幕该写口播没说的那一半。